Archive for the ‘Movies’ Category

Leblon Commercial


2010
06.22

A commercial I made.

Cria Cuervos


2010
06.10

Cria Cuervos Carlos Saura’s 1975 drama focuses on the story of young girl, Ana, who has lost her mother to a horrible illness and whose father has just died. Ana is a very serious child who is constantly observing those around her. Throughout the traumatic ordeals she suffers, she is hauntingly calm and displays a maturity beyond her age. There is also a dark side to Ana. It is not established whether her illusions – seeing her dead mother, or witnessing a fight between her parents that happened long ago – are due to the development of a trauma-induced mental illness, or simply a surrealistic way for Saura to show what is going on in Ana’s mind. Either way, whether Ana’s mother is physically with Ana or not, her presence is felt like a heavy weight of sadness and longing throughout the film. Ana comes up with a way to see her mother whenever she pleases; she squeezes her eyes shut and when she opens them, the illusion becomes real. We all have moments, just as we cross from consciousness to dreams or from sleeping to waking, when our feelings overwhelm us and we feel the presence of people we have lost, or people who could not possibly be anywhere near us. This is the power of the bond between family members, lovers, and friends. Ana felt such a strong connection to her mother that she was able to conjure a real presence in her mind. She also believed her father had essentially caused her mother’s death.

The character of Ana’s father is portrayed in a complicated manner. The film opens with his painful death; Ana listens as he chokes out his last words. She sees his mistress, half-clothed, flee the room. Ana calmly waits until her father has died, then she goes into his room, takes the glass beside his bedside, and washes it out in the sink. Here is the first instance in which we see Ana’s mother. She always speaks to her daughter with a profound tenderness that shows her unconditional love and affection. It is difficult to know whether this is how Ana perceives her mother – since it is in her imagination – or if her mother was truly that kind. There is a huge difference here between the way Ana’s mother treats her and the way her father treats her.

In the sequences that take us back to the time when Ana’s father was alive, we see him breeze in and out of Ana’s life, hardly noticing her, flirting with women, and ignoring the needs of Ana’s mother. Perhaps the most telling scene is the one in which Ana witnesses a fight between her mother and father that took place a long time ago. Ana’s mother claims that she is sick, very sick. Her father doesn’t understand. This moment epitomizes the disconnect between them.

This film contains many motifs that can be attributed to the theme of death or mortality. The film opens with a painful death. It centers on a young girl who has lost both her parents, and must come to terms with death and growing up without parents. There is a scene in which Ana’s younger sister, Maite, asks her older sister Irene what happens when you die. Irene replies, “Nothing. You just die.” Later, Ana’s mother suffers the agony of her illness, and she cries to Ana, “I want to die, I want to die.” Ana remains unfazed by this. She quietly takes everything in.

The one time Ana displays any emotion beyond her serious, haunting stare is when she conjures her mother into her bedroom and her mother tells her a story. Then, all of a sudden, her mother is gone. Ana begins crying and screaming, calling out for her mother. Here is the first moment we see Ana cry; perhaps this is the first time she realizes her mother is really gone, and the reality of the death hits her. Her Aunt Paulina comes in to comfort her, and begins to tell the same story that Ana’s mother just told her. Ana says quietly, “I wish you were dead.” We see the pure resentment in her eyes. She is a child who has lost the innocence of youth, and she views death more as a solution than a tragedy.

This film is a harrowing journey through the mind of a young girl during a particularly traumatic time in her life, and the surrealistic qualities make it even more powerful. One can also draw parallels between this story and the political conflict in Spain during Franco’s regime. Aunt Paulina comes into their home and takes control of the three orphaned girls, ruling over them with a firm hand disguised by a syrupy sweet demeanor. Overall, the story was masterfully woven together, reality mingling with projections of Ana’s imagination, and brief interruptions by the grown-up Ana, describing the events as someone who has lived through them and is now looking back with a forlorn and resigned perspective.

The Lives of Others


2010
03.04

The Lives of OthersIn this somber and thought-provoking film about socialist Germany, the character of Captain Wiesler, a member of the Stasi, is ordered to spy on playwright Georg Dreyman. Wiesler begins his investigation with complete loyalty to the socialist party, but slowly he gains clarity about the situation and must make difficult decisions regarding the fate of his subject. One particular scene best exemplifies this aspect of Wiesler’s inner conflict: Wiesler goes to his boss, Colonel Grubitz, with a detailed report outlining Dreyman’s activities, some of which might be considered subversive by party officials. Before Wiesler hands in his report, Grubitz, a character who epitomizes the callous, malignant, totalitarian government official who benefits from the suffering of others, excitedly describes a new way to interrogate (essentially, torture) artists; he explains how the party would go about interrogating Dreyer. As Wiesler listens to his boss speak so easily about ending a man’s career and completing crushing his spirit, he begins to deliberate about whether or not he should hand in his report. In this moment, Wiesler makes a choice that will define his character in the film. He leaves Grubitz’s office without giving his report. He simply says that he has seen no suspicious activity, and that perhaps it’s best if they lessen the amount of surveillance on Dreyer. Grubitz agrees, with reservations.

Wiesler is perhaps the most complicated character in the film. We are privy to the most intimate details of his life; we see his small, nondescript apartment, the prostitute whom he begs to stay with him, contrasted with his professional identity: his harsh, serious attitude that makes him an unrelenting interrogator and loyal member of the socialist party. One could argue that Wiesler has a weakness for human connection. This scene shows his sensitivity to others; he has formed a bond with his subject, Georg Dreyer, as he spends nearly every waking moment of his life listening to and watching him. Wiesler does not interact with many people; in fact, he tends to avoid becoming close to anyone. But he develops an obsession with the life of Dreyer, as though the surveillance has become an addiction for him. Wiesler’s emotional and psychological connection to Dreyer impedes his ability to act in the best interest of the party he works for. In the scene, he is torn between his loyalty to the Stasi party and his subject. Grubitz sits across from him, fixing him with an unfeeling glare, waiting for the report. He expects to hear condemning evidence from Wiesler about the playwright. Wiesler must decide in a matter of moments whether it is worth protecting Dreyer and keeping secrets from the powerful Stasi. Towards the end of the scene, he makes a deliberate choice that will lead him to his ultimate decision to risk his career – and even his life – to protect Dreyer. It is in that one moment, where he does not give Grubitz his report, that he shows the audience his human side, his sensitivity, and the wavering of his loyalty to the socialist party; essentially, his questioning of the government’s motives in the operation. It is this scene that shows the power and danger of free will, which, paradoxically, is something that totalitarian governments try hard to extinguish.

American Beauty


2009
09.23

images2Depressed, middle-aged Lester Burnham (Kevin Spacey) is unappreciated by his controlling wife Carolyn (Anette Bening) and unloved by his rebellious teenage daughter Jane (Thora Birch). With his dead-end job, non-existent sex-life, and the relentless repetition of his stilted suburban lifestyle, Lester is headed straight for a mid-life crisis. He falls for his daughter’s friend Angela, an arrogant blonde with hopes of being a model, who brags constantly about her prospering sex life to Jane. Lester becomes obsessed with Angela, and as a result he quits his job to flip burgers at a fast-food restaurant, starts working out, smoking weed, and ultimately destroys his relationship with his wife, Carolyn, who begins having an affair with the “Real Estate King.”

His antics embarrass his daughter to no end, and she, in the meantime, seeks comfort from creepy next-door neighbor Ricky, drug dealer and documentarian, whose father is a violent, homophobic ex-war sergeant. Ricky is supplying Lester with marijuana, but the sergeant mistakes their relationship for a sexual one and his overprotective instincts set in.

A climactic scene brings Lester right where he always wanted to be: staring at Angela’s naked body as she waits for him to make love to her. Then she breaks the news: she’s a virgin.

This is a darkly comic drama about the lives of three members of the same dysfunctional family, who can’t stand each other. It sheds light on what lies beneath the superficial surface of small-town suburban life.

Extract


2009
09.08

extract-posterIf you liked Office Space, check out this latest comedy from writer/director Mike Judge. Starring Jason Bateman, Mila Kunis, Ben Affleck, and Kristin Wiig, this movie is funny in a discombobulated, depressing kind of way.

Food-flavoring factory owner Joel (Bateman) has to deal with his eccentric employees, a lawsuit, and his wife’s complete refusal to have sex with him. The film is loaded with ironic comedy, those characters that you love to hate (like Joel’s neighbor), and it also examines the gap between the lower-level factory workers and higher-level management.

This offbeat comedy was fun to watch and totally unexpected. You become very involved with the characters, because they really do seem like real people with real problems.

I recommend this movie because it’s different. It’s not the cookie-cutter Hollywood comedy that I’m used to seeing in theaters. While the premise is unsettling, and it seems like Joel’s life is just going to suck forever, it pulls together by the end and becomes a wholly satisfying film.