Archive for the ‘Art’ Category

Rufino Tamayo: Retrato de Olga


2010
05.10

Retrato de Olga

Celebrated artist Rufino Tamayo was born in 1899 in Oaxaca, Mexico. He later moved to Mexico City, where he began to develop his painting skills and techniques. Unlike many other Latin American artists, Tamayo kept his artistic work separate from politics. He did not want to make socio-political statements with his art; to him, art was just art, not intended to represent something else or make claims about his political ideologies. He was especially fascinated with the human figure and many of his paintings depict variations of the human form, some more abstract than others. His subjects were often Mexican peasants and other common folk, and while he did not intend to make a statement about the social or political climate, he captured the vivid imagery of day-to-day life in Mexican villages. He also often included sensual imagery in his art, such as halved papayas and phallic objects. He experimented with various stylistic techniques, employing elements of Impressionism, Cubism, and Fauvism in his work.

His painting “Retrato de Olga” hangs in the Museum of Latin American Art in Long Beach. It is one of the largest pieces in the gallery. It portrays a regal woman with a quiet gaze, arms folded before her. He used oil paints on canvas for this particular work. “Retrato de Olga” means simply “Portrait of Olga.” Tamayo painted this in 1948, at which time he was living in New York with his wife (and subject of this portrait), Olga. Tamayo had previously had an affair with a woman named María Izquierdo, which caused a major disconnect from his wife. He had painted a portrait of his lover as well, “Retrato de María Izquierdo.” Later on, after their affair ended, he often alluded to her memory in his other paintings, such as depicting the significant image of an open window in her apartment.

“Retrato de Olga” seems almost somber, as though Tamayo felt a great distance from the woman in the portrait. It is not the work of a man in love with his subject, and it lacks intimacy. Olga looks down upon the viewer, cold and aloof. She has no discernable expression on her face. Tamayo used Modernist techniques for this portrait; Olga’s eyes do not appear to contain pupils or irises and the colors are muted shades of brown, gray, off-white, and tan. Olga wears a thick white-yellow necklace around her neck, and a dark gray shawl over one shoulder. The curve of her breast is visible through her light brown shirt. Her dark hair is piled awkwardly on top of her head in a perfectly oval bun. There is no depth to the portrait; the subject is flattened against her off-white background. One can almost detect a hint of disgust in the way her mouth curls, very subtly, at the corners. Though she is portrayed elegantly, perfectly centered in the frame of the portrait, the matted image and subdued colors negate any sense of passion, or intimacy, or even of love. This painting could be of anyone; it certainly doesn’t seem like that of a life-long partner. Perhaps Tamayo was struggling to reignite the passion in his relationship or to relieve some of his guilt over the affair. Either way, the portrait seems to embody the despair and heartache that often infiltrate the lives of those who are unfaithful.

This is but one of the many pieces completed by Tamayo during his long, full life. Tamayo’s paintings are displayed in museums in galleries all over the United States, Mexico, South America, and Europe. Though he passed away in 1991, his art is still appreciated by millions and his canon of work will not soon be forgotten.

Girl At Mirror


2009
09.05

girl-at-mirror-19541

In a small town in Western Massachusetts called Stockbridge, there is a museum dedicated to the work of the artist Norman Rockwell. A brilliant painter, who described himself as a storyteller, Rockwell was born in New York City in 1894. Later in his career, he moved to Stockbridge. His paintings are renowned for their unique, lifelike style and he is famous for having illustrated the Saturday Evening Post.

Coincidentally, I was also born in New York City and moved to Stockbridge, Massachusetts when I was seven years old. I was exposed to the art of Norman Rockwell many times before I graduated elementary school; his museum was right down the road, and the destination of numerous class trips. I was captivated the moment I set eyes on his artwork. His paintings weave intricate stories and depict realistic moments in everyday life. I see something of myself in every single one of his paintings.

On one particular 7th grade class trip to the Norman Rockwell Museum, we were required to study a painting and try to draw it ourselves. I came across Girl At Mirror and knew instantly that it was my favorite painting in the world. I fell in love with its lonely, solitary appeal and at the same time I was awestruck by its grandeur. I spent the next hour trying to sketch it, but wound up only with a pile of waded paper littered around my feet and a broken pencil in my hand. Some paintings are meant to be looked at, not copied.

Girl At Mirror is a simple painting of a young girl sitting in front of a mirror, a look of quiet, sad concentration on her face. In her lap is a magazine open to a photo of a beautiful actress. The girl is trying to emulate the face of the actress, but failing. She has brown hair and dark eyes. The little girl’s desire to be an adult, to skip the torment of her awkward age, spoke to me in a way that no other painting ever had.

Upon reflection, it is not unusual for a young girl to covet the fashion and glamour of grown-up actresses. It is the desire of every girl to be as beautiful as the women in magazines. But when I was that age, self-conscious and shy, I felt completely alone, like the girl in the painting. She sits in a dark room, clothed in the innocence of a white dress, with a mirror propped up against a chair and a forgotten doll on the floor. She is making the transition from youth to adulthood, trading her dolls for magazines and make-up.

Though I am much older now, and can’t relate to the painting like I used to, I still remember how it affected me when I was young. The painting provided a symbolic reflection for my developing into a woman. And despite my inability to copy the painting, Rockwell inspired me to keep making art. He was the first artist that truly made me feel as though even the everyday lives of ordinary people could be beautiful. I began noticing that pieces of life could become art, that the ordinary could become the extraordinary. Even a simple moment, like the loneliness of a young girl looking into a mirror, can contain symbolism that is uniquely meaningful to each person who looks at it. While many critics dismissed Rockwell’s art as being too idealistic and sentimental, I believe his intent was to draw attention to the irony of human tragedy by creating overly exaggerated scenes of the cookie-cutter American lifestyle. Because of Rockwell, I immersed myself in the study of art. Eventually, I sold two paintings at an art gallery in Honolulu, and to this day I draw, paint, write, and make movies, dedicating myself to art just like Norman Rockwell did.

When I look at Girl at Mirror now, it occurs to me that when she grows up, that little girl will be ten times as beautiful as the woman in the magazine.

Le Dejeuner sur La’herbe


2009
02.22

images

Manet was by the Seine near Argenteuil one day with his good friend Antonin Proust, and he saw some naked ladies bathing. He said to Proust, “It seems I must do a nude. All right, I’ll do one for them… in the transparent air, with people like those we can see over there. They’ll slay me for it, but let them say what they like.”

And so, in 1863, he painted “Le Dejeuner sur L’herbe”. This painting shows two fully clothed men sitting with a naked woman on a blanket, next to an open luncheon basket. “Le Dejeuner sur L’herbe” means “Luncheon on the Grass”. Another woman is bent in a meadow in the background, and, behind her, a small boat resting on the grassy shore. The painting is done in dark shades, the forest is dark green and brown, the men in black and grey suits, and this accentuates the woman’s pale naked body. She is looking straight out at the observer, with no expression on her face. One of the men is leaning back, relaxed, in the grass, and has his hand outstretched in a gesture that suggests he is in conversation with his companions. The men look neither excited nor displeased to have the woman with them. The painting has a hazy, almost out-of-focus style. The complexions of the people are greenish and the way they are painted is realistic, with folds in the cloth, detail of features, and perspective. Unlike the early paintings, before the Renaissance, we see interaction and movement, much closer to a photograph. Things are not perfect; the lunch basket is spilled, the entire set-up is unbalanced, giving it a more interesting, intriguing sense. The mood is easy, peaceful and relaxed; it is not dramatic or tense. The painting does not depict a realistic situation; it is closer to a male fantasy.

The painting was met with rejection and criticism, which greatly distressed Manet. The reason for the disputes and controversy surrounding the painting was that the naked woman in the painting was not a goddess or a holy figure; she was a common Parisian woman (Manet’s favorite model, Victorine Meurend) and this had never been done before Manet. Women found it offensive, and critics accused it of being “anti-academic” and “politically suspect”. The two men in the painting are Manet’s brother-in-law, Ferdinand Leenhoff, and Manet’s younger brother, Eugene.

What was the reason for the painting? What was Manet’s purpose? Manet made it clear that he did not care what people said, he intended to paint a nude and paint a nude he did. But then, when the Salon in France rejected it, he was upset. Though he can’t have been too upset, because in that same year he painted “Olympia” which also shows a naked woman lying on a bed. Also, later, in 1878, he painted “Woman in Bathtub” which depicts a naked woman’s backside.

Perhaps the painting was simply for Manet’s own pleasure, and that of thousands of other men. It was a fantasy that possibly many of them secretly harbored. Until that time it was unheard of. The naked woman in that picture was a revolution in itself, and it broke out of the proper traditional method of painting. Le Dejeuner sur L’herbe inspired Claude Monet to paint a similar picture, another “Luncheon on the Grass” in 1865.